Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docker node:16-alpine vs node:18-alpine #1778

Closed
ORESoftware opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

docker node:16-alpine vs node:18-alpine #1778

ORESoftware opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ORESoftware
Copy link

ORESoftware commented Sep 29, 2022 •
edited

What is the problem this feature will solve?

Just curious why the docker base image for node:18-alpine is about 50mb bigger than node:16-alpine...is that a node version thing:

<none>            <none>    cfa90264f10f   9 minutes ago    185MB    # node version 18
oresoftware/uta   <none>    94a5ccac21dd   12 minutes ago   133MB    # node version 16

or is just the way the image was created otherwise?

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

trim down the alpine image for version 18

What alternatives have you considered?

not sure
@richardlau richardlau transferred this issue from nodejs/node Sep 29, 2022
@nschonni
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #1776

@nschonni nschonni marked this as a duplicate of #1776 Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nschonni @ORESoftware