Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node:alpine Check failed: !holder_map.has_named_interceptor(). #40068

Closed
trouba opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Node:alpine Check failed: !holder_map.has_named_interceptor(). #40068

trouba opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
duplicate Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs.

Comments

@trouba
Copy link

trouba commented Sep 10, 2021

Version

16.9.0

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Not sure this is the right place to ask this, but I'm using the node:alpine image on a gitlab-ci, and the CI fails (Jest tests) with this bug: #40030

Is there a way to run the node:alpine image, and not change the CI config to use node:16.8.0-alpine ?

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every run of CI

What is the expected behavior?

CI runs correctly

What do you see instead?

Jest test fails with the following error:

# Fatal error in , line 0
# Check failed: !holder_map.has_named_interceptor().

@Mesteery
Copy link
Member

This will be fixed in Node.js v16.9.1.
Refs: #40069.

@Mesteery Mesteery added the duplicate Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs. label Sep 10, 2021
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Sep 10, 2021

Duplicate of #40030.

@aduh95 aduh95 closed this as completed Sep 10, 2021
lowlighter added a commit to lowlighter/metrics that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2021
JayantGoel001 added a commit to JayantGoel001/metrics that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants