Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Built-in test module only report ouput of the first top level describe #46478

Closed
piranna opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 10 comments · Fixed by #46544
Closed

Built-in test module only report ouput of the first top level describe #46478

piranna opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 10 comments · Fixed by #46544

Comments

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor

piranna commented Feb 3, 2023

Version

v19.4.0

Platform

Linux AVRAST1790 5.19.0-30-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jan 6 15:40:20 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Subsystem

test

What steps will reproduce the bug?

On a test file with multiple top level describe, report output only show the first one of them that got run. Any other describe gets no reported nor counted, both passing or failing. In fact, final report don't provide correct statistics at all:

TAP version 13
# Subtest: /home/piranna/Trabajo/Avrioc/EsDiPi/test/cli.js
    # longestStatic:  36
    # length:  85917
    # Subtest: clean-sdp
    ok 1 - clean-sdp # SKIP
      ---
      duration_ms: 2.336453
      ...
    # Subtest: compress
    ok 2 - compress # SKIP
      ---
      duration_ms: 0.057482
      ...
    # Subtest: empty esdipi
    ok 3 - empty esdipi
      ---
      duration_ms: 5.970628
      ...
    # Subtest: Offer esdipi
    ok 4 - Offer esdipi
      ---
      duration_ms: 21.166008
      ...
    # Subtest: Answer esdipi
    ok 5 - Answer esdipi
      ---
      duration_ms: 9.956793
      ...
    1..8
ok 1 - /home/piranna/Trabajo/Avrioc/EsDiPi/test/cli.js
  ---
  duration_ms: 104.264871
  ...
1..1
# tests 1
# pass 1
# fail 0
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0
# duration_ms 106.675893

It should be showing 11 total tests, passing 4 (3 from "empty esdipi" describe and another top level one not shown), 6 skipped ones from the "clean-sdp" and "compress" describes, and 1 failed top level one not shown.

If there are other skipped describes, they are shown as skipped, but there's no info of any other describe or test defined it. In fact, if I have tests after that describe, they get run (checked with c8 coverage, code being tested by that tests gets covered) but their status is not reported at all, both failed or sucessful. If I move one of that test that's passing to be executed before the describes, lefting one test that's failing to execute after the describes, then the first test and all the describes (including the skipped ones) fails with the next error and don't get executed at all:

   not ok 2 - clean-sdp # SKIP
       ---
      duration_ms: 0
      failureType: 'cancelledByParent'
      error: 'Promise resolution is still pending but the event loop has already resolved'
      code: 'ERR_TEST_FAILURE'
      stack: |-
        process.emit (node:events:512:28)
      ...

It seems like the test module has been tested or is more indented to have a single top level describe or test entry, not allowing to have several ones.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Always.

What is the expected behavior?

All describes and tests are being executed and reported, both passing and failing ones, no matter of their order of if they are inside describe / sub-tests.

What do you see instead?

Only first describe / sub-test is being reported, any other top level test or describe are excluded from reports.

Additional information

It seems there are several inter-related errors on this issue.

@MoLow
Copy link
Member

MoLow commented Feb 4, 2023

please include the file you are running and the cli command

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 7, 2023

please include the file you are running and the cli command

I have uploaded my project to https://github.com/piranna/ESDiPi, and the actual file with the tests are at https://github.com/piranna/ESDiPi/blob/main/test/cli.js, you can play with them reordering or skipping them and will have the same behaviour I have. Module itself is working properly, so tests should not give you problems, just only the Node.js test tests runner module.

@MoLow
Copy link
Member

MoLow commented Feb 7, 2023

@piranna the issue is the usage of describe with test. describe is supposed to be used with it only - which I hope will be fixed/changed,
but in the meanwhile you can change you code from test to it

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 7, 2023

@piranna the issue is the usage of describe with test. describe is supposed to be used with it only - which I hope will be fixed/changed,

Aren't they aliases between them? At least it's the feel it gives on the docs (not that it says it, it's just a feeling) and the same for describe()...

@MoLow
Copy link
Member

MoLow commented Feb 7, 2023

Aren't they aliases between them? At least it's the feel it gives on the docs (not that it says it, it's just a feeling) and the same for describe()...

they are not aliases, but I agree it is a fair expectation for test to work the same way it does, thus I opened a PR to change the behavior #46544

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 7, 2023

thus I opened a PR to change the behavior #46544

Thank you :-)

1 similar comment
@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 7, 2023

thus I opened a PR to change the behavior #46544

Thank you :-)

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 10, 2023

in the meanwhile you can change you code from test to it

I confirm that with it instead of test, all tests and describes runned :-) Just only, the global metrics are still wrong:

TAP version 13
# Subtest: /home/piranna/Trabajo/Avrioc/ESDiPi/test/cli.js
    # Subtest: clean-sdp
        # Subtest: empty SDP
        ok 1 - empty SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 6.303494
          ...
        # Subtest: Offer SDP
        ok 2 - Offer SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 12.954568
          ...
        # Subtest: Answer SDP
        ok 3 - Answer SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 5.798613
          ...
        1..3
    ok 1 - clean-sdp
      ---
      duration_ms: 26.163698
      ...
    # Subtest: compress
        # Subtest: empty SDP
        ok 1 - empty SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 0.579423
          ...
        # Subtest: Offer SDP
        ok 2 - Offer SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 74.314906
          ...
        # Subtest: Answer SDP
        ok 3 - Answer SDP
          ---
          duration_ms: 54.413326
          ...
        1..3
    ok 2 - compress
      ---
      duration_ms: 129.464455
      ...
    # Subtest: decompress
        # Subtest: empty esdipi
        ok 1 - empty esdipi
          ---
          duration_ms: 1.232121
          ...
        # Subtest: Offer esdipi
        ok 2 - Offer esdipi
          ---
          duration_ms: 8.018468
          ...
        # Subtest: Answer esdipi
        ok 3 - Answer esdipi
          ---
          duration_ms: 7.692408
          ...
        1..3
    ok 3 - decompress
      ---
      duration_ms: 17.10319
      ...
    # Subtest: prefix
    not ok 4 - prefix
      ---
      duration_ms: 0.843434
      failureType: 'cancelledByParent'
      error: 'Promise resolution is still pending but the event loop has already resolved'
      code: 'ERR_TEST_FAILURE'
      stack: |-
        process.emit (node:events:512:28)
      ...
    # Subtest: unknown command
    not ok 5 - unknown command
      ---
      duration_ms: 0
      failureType: 'cancelledByParent'
      error: 'Promise resolution is still pending but the event loop has already resolved'
      code: 'ERR_TEST_FAILURE'
      stack: |-
        process.emit (node:events:512:28)
      ...
    1..5
not ok 1 - /home/piranna/Trabajo/Avrioc/ESDiPi/test/cli.js
  ---
  duration_ms: 238.9463
  failureType: 'subtestsFailed'
  exitCode: 1
  error: 'test failed'
  code: 'ERR_TEST_FAILURE'
  ...
1..1
# tests 1
# pass 0
# fail 1
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0
# duration_ms 243.316294

I think with these tests output report they should be

# tests 11
# pass 9
# fail 0
# cancelled 2
# skipped 0
# todo 0

Maybe that should be another issue?

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Feb 10, 2023

Maybe that should be another issue?

That's being handled in #46440.

@piranna
Copy link
Contributor Author

piranna commented Feb 10, 2023

That's being handled in #46440.

Cool, thank you for the pointer :-)

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2023
PR-URL: #46544
Fixes: #46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MoLow added a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46544
Fixes: nodejs#46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2023
PR-URL: #46544
Fixes: #46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2023
PR-URL: #46544
Fixes: #46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MoLow added a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46544
Fixes: nodejs#46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MoLow added a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46544
Fixes: nodejs#46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MoLow added a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46544
Fixes: nodejs#46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2023
PR-URL: #46544
Backport-PR-URL: #46839
Fixes: #46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2023
PR-URL: #46544
Backport-PR-URL: #46839
Fixes: #46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
juliangruber pushed a commit to nodejs/node-core-test that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs/node#46544
Fixes: nodejs/node#46478
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2787e2dfc2e10c584259ff34d7aad565447a84d9)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants