Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test,esm: validate more edge cases for dynamic imports #46059

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 4, 2023

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Jan 2, 2023

@nodejs/loaders this is relevant to the off-threading discussions, the idea is to make sure that using dynamic import doesn't break the expected order of operations if the main thread is being frozen.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Jan 2, 2023
Copy link
Member

@juanarbol juanarbol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙌 thanks for this!

test/es-module/test-esm-loader-hooks.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
const { code, signal, stdout, stderr } = await spawnPromisified(execPath, [
'--no-warnings',
'--experimental-loader',
fixtures.fileURL('es-module-loaders/never-settling-resolve-step/loader.mjs'),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not for this PR, but I've noticed that in most uses of fixtures.fileURL we treat it as if it's returning a string when in fact it's a URL, and I guess it's getting cast to a string here. We might want to change the function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it matter? FWIW I prefer it returning a URL as now.

Copy link
Contributor

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good wording refinements 🙂

@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Jan 3, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 3, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jan 3, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jan 4, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 9b1ed04 into nodejs:main Jan 4, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 9b1ed04

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the custom-loader-dynamic-imports branch January 4, 2023 17:29
RafaelGSS pushed a commit to RafaelGSS/node that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46059
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2023
PR-URL: #46059
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2023
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
PR-URL: #46059
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
@juanarbol juanarbol mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2023
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2023
PR-URL: #46059
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants