You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If this link is clicked in safari, although the link goes to the right page, it does not correctly scroll to the correct location - or indeed scroll down at all.
This seems to affect all versions, including Ventura & Safari Technology Preview
Although this feature in theory speeds up navigation, I think the ability to work across browser is more important. It's not clear whether this is a safari bug, or a mkdocs bug (safari often keeps closer to standards, and can be less pragmatic)
This bug was introduced by:
94327250f (Nigel Jones 2022-01-11 19:56:27 +0000 834) - navigation.instant
I therefore propose to revert.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
planetf1
added a commit
to planetf1/egeria-docs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2022
When using Safari, anchor links do not work properly.
For example, go to https://egeria-project.org/concepts/discovery-analysis-report, scroll down and click on 'Data Class Annotation'.
This links to https://egeria-project.org/features/discovery-and-stewardship/overview/#data-class-discovery
If this link is clicked in safari, although the link goes to the right page, it does not correctly scroll to the correct location - or indeed scroll down at all.
This seems to affect all versions, including Ventura & Safari Technology Preview
In Chrome & Safari the links work correctly.
On digging, it appears this is caused by one of thge navigation features (navigation.instant). This is discussed in squidfunk/mkdocs-material#2881 and in the mkdocs docs at https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/setup/setting-up-navigation/#instant-loading
Although this feature in theory speeds up navigation, I think the ability to work across browser is more important. It's not clear whether this is a safari bug, or a mkdocs bug (safari often keeps closer to standards, and can be less pragmatic)
This bug was introduced by:
I therefore propose to revert.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: