Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include the Tail Sampling Processor #1229

Open
seh opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Include the Tail Sampling Processor #1229

seh opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@seh
Copy link

seh commented Mar 27, 2024

Motivating Problem

When running the OpenTelemetry Collector alongside a Lambda function, it is difficult to coordinate running separate tail sampling proxies like Honeycomb Refinery, for lack of a suitable container orchestration system being available. It would be beneficial to perform tail sampling within the OpenTelemetry Collector running alongside each Lambda function as well.

Proposed Solution

Make the Tail Sampling Processor available as a processor in the OpenTelemetry Collector Lambda layer's build.

Alternatives Considered

Set up a Kubernetes or ECS cluster to run Honeycomb Refinery, and export traces from each OpenTelemetry Collector to Refinery for tail sampling. However, for a system that relies solely on AWS Lambda functions, establishing that separate environment within which to run Refinery is difficult.

Additional Context

I don't know the change in "weight" in the size of the built executable file results from adding this new processor.

@seh seh added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 27, 2024
@tylerbenson
Copy link
Member

@seh any interest in contributing a PR for this?

@seh
Copy link
Author

seh commented May 4, 2024

@seh any interest in contributing a PR for this?

Yes, though it would help to have an example that shows similar precedent, in order to help get started and show how large such a patch is likely to become. Do any other components introduced like this come to mind?

@tylerbenson
Copy link
Member

Maybe a combination of #959 and #1046?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants