We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What are you trying to achieve?
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/telemetry-stability.md marked as stable.
Additional context.
Having this document as experimental brings confusion if it must be adopted. E.g.
It would be very good to have it stable given that we already have HTTP semantic conventions marked as stable.
CC @open-telemetry/semconv-http-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-semconv-approvers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jsuereth do you think this should be moved to semconv or stay in spec?
(@jack-berg will add this to the next spec meeting agenda).
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
What are you trying to achieve?
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/telemetry-stability.md marked as stable.
Additional context.
Having this document as experimental brings confusion if it must be adopted. E.g.
It would be very good to have it stable given that we already have HTTP semantic conventions marked as stable.
CC @open-telemetry/semconv-http-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-semconv-approvers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: