You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
MANDATORY MATCH (u:User {id: $user})
MANDATORY MATCH (c:City {name: $city})
MANDATORY MATCH (old:Product {id: $product})<-[:BOUGHT]-(u)
MATCH (store)-[:IN]->(c),
(store)-[:SELLS]->(new:Product),
(new)-[:MADE_BY]->(brand)<-[:MADE_BY]-(old)
WHERE new.availability > 0 AND new.category = old.category
RETURN store, count(DISTINCT new) AS offers
ORDER BY offers
On Tue., Aug. 2, 2022, 6:55 a.m. Petra Selmer, ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Jacob
Thank you for raising this issue.
Although MANDATORY MATCH was accepted into Cypher, it is not at this
current time included in the TCK and grammar.
I have added a note to this effect at the top of the article -- apologies
for the confusion.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#538 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFKHXSDR2WDKVVGLFGDTQLVXD5BLANCNFSM54MIHAOQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
Taking this from examples:
See here
I can't find any rules in the EBNF for MANDATORY MATCH, even though MANDATORY is a reserved word. Please advise...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: