Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document process for requesting Organisation Billing (Codespaces + Runners + Etc) #1092

Closed
ovflowd opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1123
Closed

Document process for requesting Organisation Billing (Codespaces + Runners + Etc) #1092

ovflowd opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1123

Comments

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member

ovflowd commented Jun 9, 2023

With #1009 we've started to provide Billing Support for GitHub organisations belonging to our member projects. This is a great step for providing resources to our project's GitHub organisations.

Webpack seemed to be the pilot for Codespaces. Which is also awesome!

Yet, we should document the process of requesting such resources and also have documented which organisations have billing enabled to X features.

I also wonder if the CPC should have access to the "recurring costs" of the billing for the sake of analysis and transparency.

This issue is about drafting a Markdown file that documents the process of requesting access to resources, such as Codespaces, or Large Runners or etc (#1089) and which current project's have access to those (The later one could be an update on README.md adding a sort of emoji or label that they have access to resource X, or somewhere else, or in the same document where we request resources).

@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva changed the title Document process for requesting Organisation Billing (Codepsaces + Runners + Etc) Document process for requesting Organisation Billing (Codespaces + Runners + Etc) Jun 11, 2023
@ovflowd
Copy link
Member Author

ovflowd commented Jul 6, 2023

Hey @bensternthal any updates here? 👀

@bensternthal
Copy link
Contributor

@ovflowd thanks for the poke. Here is what I am thinking for an outline of this doc.

  • What kind of Github Resources are eligible for funding
  • How to request funding from the CPC
  • What happens next
    • LF budget approval
    • Billing contact/virtual credit card
  • Markdown table listing each project, what resources are funded and how much

I can write all the bullets except the CPC one. ..

  1. Should the CPC approve these requests? (I feel like yes but am open to other ideas)
  2. If so, would you be able to help draft the CPC approval process portion? I suspect this would be filing an issue with specific information etc.

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member Author

ovflowd commented Jul 7, 2023

I'd like the CPCP to approve these resources. We can talk about this at the next CPC meeting. I would be able to draft the CPC process portion, but my English is probably not the best suited for these nuances.

I would love to get some help. We can craft a PR together, and the CPC can review/add feedback/suggest changes to the wording.

What about we work on this together at the next CPC Working Session/Meeting?

@bensternthal
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like a plan!

@joesepi
Copy link
Member

joesepi commented Jul 25, 2023

@bensternthal and @ovflowd worked on this last week and there should be a PR coming. 🎉

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member Author

ovflowd commented Jul 25, 2023

The PR is already open, @joesepi #1123

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants