Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 8, 2021. It is now read-only.

Implement UI / UX for more usable IRC configurations #4

Open
7 tasks
bnvk opened this issue May 2, 2015 · 4 comments
Open
7 tasks

Implement UI / UX for more usable IRC configurations #4

bnvk opened this issue May 2, 2015 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@bnvk
Copy link
Member

bnvk commented May 2, 2015

The following are the proposed UI / UX tasks needed to make sense of the backend configurations of proposed in issue #412 to Shout application

Public Sign In

  • User is asked for only Name and generates suggest nickname
  • User can click "more options" for detailed IRC settings

User Sees (upon signing in)

  • Automatically signed into one or multiple "fixed" Networks + Channels
  • Interface hides the ability to leave these channels depending on specifications
  • If only has one server (and cannot join others) hide the idea of "Server" altogether from UI
  • If only has one channel (and cannot join others) hide the idea of "Channels" altogether from UI
  • Auto hiding and showing and user controlled of sidebar as per above settings
@bnvk bnvk added this to the 0.1.0 milestone May 2, 2015
@jdittrich
Copy link
Member

What about saving the channels a user visited? I assume that most users visit certain channels frequently.

@bnvk
Copy link
Member Author

bnvk commented May 17, 2015

@jdittrich that definitely makes for a good user experience. It will depend on the configuration of a Slick/Shout instance- using the "non-public" account there is already this feature for "user accounts"

@jdittrich
Copy link
Member

Great. I don’t know how prominent it is in the non-public account, but I assume this is an important feature. As well, for the public account, one could probably use a cookie (or the like) to save the channel names.

@simonv3
Copy link
Member

simonv3 commented May 24, 2015

For bullet #1. I would argue that a user can submit a username. I think most people are familiar with the concept, and that it having something being auto generated would only confuse things.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants