Doubt in 1.5. Types of questions to support, and a suggestion for the session results mocks #19774
-
|
As I was going through the project details and mockups, some questions have arisen.
Correction in PRD,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 6 replies
-
|
Ah -- thanks for clarifying this. The practice player can respond to all sorts of questions. But handling the detailed design for all the other question types is not meant to be in-scope for this project; that should probably be handled as part of the exploration player redesign project which @Vir-8 is looking at (because they use the same component) or as a separate project after that. In the interim, anything that results in a reasonable learning experience will do. The pop-up suggestion is good, I will let the designer know. I have fixed both issues in the PRD, thanks for pointing them out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@seanlip which project did you mean here by "exploration player redesign project"? I didn't find anything similar in https://github.com/oppia/oppia/wiki/Google-Summer-of-Code-2024 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's this one, it's not a GSoC project: #19217 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the clarification!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@seanlip @nikitaevg Can we use a library to create the desired animation or do we have to write it from scratch? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@HardikGoyal2003 I'd defer to Nikita for this, but I recommend that you start a new discussion thread for each question. Otherwise this thread shows up as "answered" in https://github.com/oppia/oppia/discussions/categories/gsoc-q-a-1-lace-projects and is easy to miss. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Got it! I will do that. Thanks!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @HardikGoyal2003! That really depends on the library:
Also, check if our code already solves your problem in some other part. We have other animations, don't we? Can we reuse that approach? If we already have a mechanism to do what you want to do, I'd rather it was reused. OTOH, if the existing mechanism is difficult to use, you could suggest a library. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@nikitaevg Thank you! I have just started another discussion with a few additional questions. I noticed your comment just now, so I apologize for the delay! Can you also review it so we can address all questions together? I will refer to this response there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No problem at all, let's move there |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
closing, as answered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Ah -- thanks for clarifying this.
The practice player can respond to all sorts of questions. But handling the detailed design for all the other question types is not meant to be in-scope for this project; that should probably be handled as part of the exploration player redesign project which @Vir-8 is looking at (because they use the same component) or as a separate project after that. In the interim, anything that results in a reasonable learning experience will do.
The pop-up suggestion is good, I will let the designer know.
I have fixed both issues in the PRD, thanks for pointing them out.