Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate whether actions-rs should be replaced #305

Open
brycx opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate whether actions-rs should be replaced #305

brycx opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
investigation Investigation task

Comments

@brycx
Copy link
Member

brycx commented Nov 22, 2022

We use actions-rs in our CI workflows. It is possible this is no longer fully maintained and also I have read talk about, that there exist more simple alternatives such as https://github.com/dtolnay/rust-toolchain
@brycx brycx added bug Something isn't working investigation Investigation task and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 22, 2022
@brycx brycx added this to the 0.17.3 milestone Nov 22, 2022
@brycx
Copy link
Member Author

brycx commented Dec 5, 2022

rust-toolchain does seem to more maintainable and cleaner, but it will make cross compilation harder, as it doesn't have the neat use-cross option we use right now. It would probably require a installation script for cross if/when we make the switch.

@brycx brycx modified the milestones: 0.17.3, 0.17.4 Dec 7, 2022
@brycx brycx removed this from the 0.17.4 milestone Mar 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
investigation Investigation task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brycx