Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

Typos in RFC 221 Transaction Control - Drafs #33

Open
bjhargrave opened this issue Dec 11, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Typos in RFC 221 Transaction Control - Drafs #33

bjhargrave opened this issue Dec 11, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
publiccomment Public comment

Comments

@bjhargrave
Copy link
Member

Original bug ID: BZ#204
From: Erwin <erwin.hogeweg@seecago.com>
Reported version: unspecified

@bjhargrave
Copy link
Member Author

Comment author: Erwin <erwin.hogeweg@seecago.com>

Spotted a few minor typos in the RFC 221 Draft document.
I assume that most are known already but I didn't see an updated doc. in git.

  • 2.2, 3rd line: It also registers a(n) Entity Manager Factory... ('n' missing)
  • 2.2, last sentence: "Entity Manager liked pool connections could" -> "Entity Manager, like pooled connections, could"
  • 2.4.1, last sentence: This (is) called Managed Transaction. ('is' missing)
  • 2.4.2, last sentence first paragraph: "usually performed (by) a JCA" ('by' missing)
  • 4.3: Blank bullet point.
  • 5.2.1, third line: duplicate 'then'.
  • 5.2.2.4, Provider Configuration paragraph: "Each factory method here supplies (a) set...". ('a' is missing).
  • 5.3.3.1: Empty bullet point in table.
  • 5.3.4, first line, 2nd sentence: "it is also may atomic..."
  • 5.3.4, second paragraph: "... when a multiple resource are ..."
  • 5.3.4.1, first line: "... for anX A transaction ..."
  • 5.3.4.2: "... will be set to Boolean. TRUE." (extra period)
  • 5.3.6.1, first line: comma after 'gathered' should be period.
  • 8.2, fourth bullet point: 'competed' should be 'completed'.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
publiccomment Public comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants