You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since I use collect() to capture values that are to be fed into an AST node, it would be very helpful to use a map instead of a list. Similarly to how you can capture named groups with regular expressions. Here's an example where I parse a Markdown heading:
The advantage being that label() is already there and used for a similar purpose. However, this might lead to values being overwritten if you collect two parsers with the same name. Another option is to provide the map upfront:
Since I use
collect()
to capture values that are to be fed into an AST node, it would be very helpful to use a map instead of a list. Similarly to how you can capture named groups with regular expressions. Here's an example where I parse a Markdown heading:Suggested improvement (last line)
One way could be to use
label()
for each collected parser and use the label as the array key passed tomap()
:The advantage being that
label()
is already there and used for a similar purpose. However, this might lead to values being overwritten if you collect two parsers with the same name. Another option is to provide the map upfront:It might be useful to have separate
collectList()
andcollectMap()
functions by the way.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: