Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider switching Xdmf to use official library #1033

Open
Yurlungur opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consider switching Xdmf to use official library #1033

Yurlungur opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Yurlungur
Copy link
Collaborator

While messing with #1019 I found that the XDMF official library now no longer requires VTK as a dependency and can probably built with only HDF5 as a dependency. It may be worth trying to switch our XDMF implementation to use the library.

However, if OpenPMD is really the future for us, I don't know how much effort I want to put into this support, as the XDMF API is painful and poorly documented. And our current implementation "works" though it isn't feature-complete for all of our capabilities.

@pgrete
Copy link
Collaborator

pgrete commented Mar 27, 2024

Agreed. If OpenPMD/ADIOS2 does the job for us in practice (so after enough testing and usage), we may not need to spent additional effort on a second library (though not depending on vtk makes it much more attractive).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants