Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce async/await in the codebase? #1213

Open
ringods opened this issue May 24, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Introduce async/await in the codebase? #1213

ringods opened this issue May 24, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
core enhancement ✨ pinned 📌 Don't let stalebot clean this up
Projects

Comments

@ringods
Copy link
Contributor

ringods commented May 24, 2020

Would it be possible to start using async/await in the PL codebase? This was already suggested when moving to Node 8 (#870) but I don't see it in the code base so far.

This request is driven by my failure in debugging #1201 so far, mainly because the whole async behaviour of Node is hard to follow. While VSCode tries to display the stack trace including the point which created a new Promise, clicking on the stack fails to display the context (block, local, closure, global). So I still fail to understand how I got into a certain situation.

https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/async-stack-traces

@ringods ringods added the core label May 24, 2020
@ringods ringods added this to To do in core 2 🧨 via automation May 24, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 25, 2020

It's hard to keep track of everything. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity, neither from the team nor the community. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please consider adding additional info, volunteering to contribute a fix for this issue, or making a further case that this is important to you, the team, and the project as a whole. Thanks!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 4, 2020

It's hard to keep track of everything. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity, neither from the team nor the community. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please consider adding additional info, volunteering to contribute a fix for this issue, or making a further case that this is important to you, the team, and the project as a whole. Thanks!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 19, 2020

It's hard to keep track of everything. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity, neither from the team nor the community. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please consider adding additional info, volunteering to contribute a fix for this issue, or making a further case that this is important to you, the team, and the project as a whole. Thanks!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 9, 2022

It's hard to keep track of everything. This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity, neither from the team nor the community. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please consider adding additional info, volunteering to contribute a fix for this issue, or making a further case that this is important to you, the team, and the project as a whole. Thanks!

@JosefBredereck JosefBredereck added the pinned 📌 Don't let stalebot clean this up label Jan 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core enhancement ✨ pinned 📌 Don't let stalebot clean this up
Projects
core 2 🧨
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants