Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make a copy for packet.Payload instead of slicing #7

Open
kixelated opened this issue Feb 17, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Make a copy for packet.Payload instead of slicing #7

kixelated opened this issue Feb 17, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@kixelated
Copy link
Contributor

When Unmarshalling, the current code slices the input to set packet.Payload. This is fast, but we really should make a copy to avoid nasty bugs. For example:

p1 := rtp.Packet{}
p2 := rtp.Packet{}

p1.Unmarshal(raw)
p2.Unmarshal(raw)

// Write in a new payload for p1
// ERROR this will also replace p2.Payload
copy(p1.Payload, newPayload)

You know how performance crazy I can be, but we should copy instead of keeping a reference to the data provided to Unmarshal.

@wdouglass
Copy link
Member

I wonder if we can unexpose p1.Payload, and have some kind of copy-on-write semantics (just because i think writing into the payload of an unmarshalled packet like this is kind of a rare edge-case)

@kixelated
Copy link
Contributor Author

kixelated commented Feb 20, 2019

I don't think copy-on-write is possible in Go because there's no such thing as a read-only slice. If you call .Payload(), then you can still muck with the returned memory.

I definitely want the default behavior to be safe. Kind of like how when you pass a buffer to json.Unmarshal, you expect it to make a copy instead of pointing to the memory in your buffer.

To that end, I would propose having Unmarshal make a copy. If you want to avoid the copy for hard-core performance reasons (and know that there are no other references to the payload), you could construct the packet with the syntax: rtp.Packet{header, payload}.

@Sean-Der
Copy link
Member

👍 on this from me, I am running into this (I can fix it, but I can see why people would be surprised)

I added ReadRTP and want to use a scratch buffer locally (via sync.Pool) but I can't because Unmarshal causes the payload to be retained by default.

@jech
Copy link
Contributor

jech commented May 11, 2021

In Galène, we use Unmarshal to access the header bits without copying the packet. We essentiallydo this :

packet.Unmarshal(buf)
kf := isKeyframe(&packet)  // reads packet.Header and packet.Payload
if(packet.Extension) {
    packet.Extensions = removeSomeExtensions(packet.Extensions)
    packet.MarshalTo(buf);
}

Note two things about this code:

  • we count on packet.Unmarshal not allocating a copy of the packet;
  • we could on packet.MarshalTo working when the destination buffer overlaps packet.Raw.

The second point is less important, since I could potentially use a second buffer in this case.

If you change the semantics of Unmarshal, please provide a new API that allows me to do the above without additional allocations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants