You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Via #5771api.derive.staking._erasExposure needed to change its internal functionality to accommodate the new changes. Currently the derive has forward and backwards compatibility via #5815.
That being said, once all relay chain runtimes are updated to 1004000 it is safe to say we can remove the erasStakersClipped, and have support for only erasStakersPaged. This means we can also adjust the types to ensure there is a single source of truth for the _eraExposure.
This is a tracking issue to ensure we stay on top of it and will be added to the projects board tracking column.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That being said, once all relay chain runtimes are updated to 1004000 it is safe to say we can remove the erasStakersClipped, and have support for only erasStakersPaged
This is referring only to the functionality in the derive, not api.query
TarikGul
changed the title
[Tracking upstream] Remove erasStakersClipped when applicable
[Tracking upstream] Remove erasStakersClipped from api.derive.staking._erasExposure when applicable
Apr 18, 2024
Via #5771
api.derive.staking._erasExposure
needed to change its internal functionality to accommodate the new changes. Currently the derive has forward and backwards compatibility via #5815.That being said, once all relay chain runtimes are updated to 1004000 it is safe to say we can remove the
erasStakersClipped
, and have support for onlyerasStakersPaged
. This means we can also adjust the types to ensure there is a single source of truth for the_eraExposure
.This is a tracking issue to ensure we stay on top of it and will be added to the projects board tracking column.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: