You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In postman, you can set authentication on the collection level (and other levels). The issue is if a collection is created by importing RAML, each imported endpoint in the collection (created from a RAML schema) has to set the "Inherit auth from parent".
Is there some directive in RAML that cause this to be set? The securedBy attribute is set to basic & endpoints do show as needing authentication settings. But it's tedious to set then in a large collection imported from RAML.
Basically I'd like basic auth to be set in one place after creating a collection from RAML in API. I can't figure out the right magic to do it however.
Maybe this is a feature request (or just unfamiliarity with postman ;))?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@shafdog I think RAML directive already defines such things best via securedBy which can be used at any resource level. But, this module doesn't have support for using it at collection or folder level yet and all authentication is set at the request level only.
As such, we can treat this as a feature request. We'll update here once we have something concrete on this.
In postman, you can set authentication on the collection level (and other levels). The issue is if a collection is created by importing RAML, each imported endpoint in the collection (created from a RAML schema) has to set the "Inherit auth from parent".
Is there some directive in RAML that cause this to be set? The securedBy attribute is set to basic & endpoints do show as needing authentication settings. But it's tedious to set then in a large collection imported from RAML.
Basically I'd like basic auth to be set in one place after creating a collection from RAML in API. I can't figure out the right magic to do it however.
Maybe this is a feature request (or just unfamiliarity with postman ;))?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: