Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split PBS bidder page #4352

Open
ChrisHuie opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Split PBS bidder page #4352

ChrisHuie opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ChrisHuie
Copy link
Contributor

ChrisHuie commented Feb 10, 2023

Currently we keep reference to server bid adapters and javascript bid adapters separated under their specific context tabs. There is decent overlap among these lists. Also, the server one isn't as easily navigable since its a single page structure and goes to a location on a page vs JS which goes to a specified page. I'm curious if we should just combine these as their own stand alone section and have a single bid adapter reference section that is searchable and links out to a reference page?

JS Bid Adapter reference - > https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/bidders.html
Server Bid Adapter reference -> https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/pbs-bidders.html

@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie changed the title Bid Adapters Not Showing on Bidders Page Should Bid Adapter Param References Be Maintained in 1 Place Feb 10, 2023
@bretg
Copy link
Contributor

bretg commented Mar 9, 2023

We should break up the PBS bidders page. Whether they can share the same md files is an implementation question. The important thing is that there's a PBJS bidders page that shows only PBJS bidders, and a separate PBS bidders page that shows only PBS bidders.

@bretg bretg changed the title Should Bid Adapter Param References Be Maintained in 1 Place Split PBS bidder page Mar 9, 2023
@muuki88
Copy link
Contributor

muuki88 commented Apr 4, 2024

Idea

  • add a filter for server & client
  • the pbs adapter page should look similar to pbjs page

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants