New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Specified" properties #1134
Comments
That doesn't exist as an option today, but in theory it is a possible alternative; however, I perceive the |
Unfortunately it's a large system, which relies largely on the old pattern, to the point that we are considering sticking to older versions. For planning purposes, how realistic would it be for us to expect this to be added back as an option? Thanks in advance. |
let me have a look this week - and see what else (hence 796 above) we might want to do at the same time; this is actually good timing, as I need to revisit all of that code because of the new protobuf "editions" feature (if you know: you know!) |
Glad to hear it from you! Thanks! |
I would very much benefit from the same change, any updates @mgravell? |
Is there any update on this issue? Thank you! |
After updating protobuf-net in our project, we noticed that the properties with suffix "Specified" have been replaced by "ShouldSerialize..." methods. Is it possible to configure protobuf-net to generate properties instead of methods in the current version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: