Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Howto doc for implementing proto3 presence in a code generator. #7407

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2020

Conversation

haberman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dlj-NaN
Copy link
Contributor

dlj-NaN commented Apr 23, 2020

Looks good!

I see this has a reference to files in #7390 . I'll hold off merging until that's in (but feel free to merge sooner if you don't mind the broken link).

not aware of proto3 presence. The synthetic oneof should not appear anywhere
in the generated API.

### Satisfying the Experimental Check
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Josh - do you want to comment on how long this will be needed? i.e. - timeline for the removal of the flag (but that the feature check within protoc will remain after that)?

@dlj-NaN dlj-NaN merged commit fda8544 into protocolbuffers:master Apr 23, 2020
@haberman
Copy link
Member Author

@thomasvl I will send you a separate PR to address this, and add a few more notes here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants