You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some young PureScript projects lack a license file, and I think this would help. It could default to All Rights Reserved (and perhaps note that on the console too?), but I think having it there would encourage users to think about licensing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think it's a problem that some projects lack a license file; if I remember correctly this was a conscious decision we made to allow projects to not have a license file if they have a recognisable SPDX expression in the license field of bower.json, during purs publish.
I think we probably do enough to encourage users to think about licensing already, in that purs publish (and consequently also pulp version and pulp publish, which use purs publish --dry-run and purs publish respectively) fail if you don't have an acceptable SPDX expression in bower.json, although I suppose it wouldn't hurt to log something like this after a successful pulp init:
consider adding a license in bower.json; for example: "license": "MIT"
Some young PureScript projects lack a license file, and I think this would help. It could default to All Rights Reserved (and perhaps note that on the console too?), but I think having it there would encourage users to think about licensing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: