You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey FastUI project maintainers, could you please share your opinion on python/typing_extensions#315 ?
I think introducing it in typing_extensions would make working with built-in generics slightly more convenient and easier to document for the new Python programmers that would be interested in trying out FastUI. Not even mentioning the simplification in defining pydantic models with the newest-fashion type annotations.
I need your opinion on the issue so that there is a good rationale behind officially backporting or NOT backporting PEP 585 and PEP 604 in Python <3.10. I, alone, probably won't convince anyone about it...
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey FastUI project maintainers, could you please share your opinion on python/typing_extensions#315 ?
I think introducing it in
typing_extensions
would make working with built-in generics slightly more convenient and easier to document for the new Python programmers that would be interested in trying out FastUI. Not even mentioning the simplification in defining pydantic models with the newest-fashion type annotations.I need your opinion on the issue so that there is a good rationale behind officially backporting or NOT backporting PEP 585 and PEP 604 in Python <3.10. I, alone, probably won't convince anyone about it...
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: