We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://www.douyin.com/note/7270009966688210216 https://p9-pc-sign.douyinpic.com/tos-cn-i-0813c001/ocDQbAn5ehHAx89Jk6qPOACAgIGICufQAAgEDo~tplv-dy-aweme-images:q75.webp?biz_tag=aweme_images&from=3213915784&s=PackSourceEnum_AWEME_DETAIL&sc=image&se=false&x-expires=1711152000&x-signature=TZ3A1QYYKjOnE0zWw757lAX%2B0MQ%3D https://p3-pc-sign.douyinpic.com/tos-cn-i-0813/ooEIPVg5bAI7TOHfAn9kXxCchDACeAA0dEAQ2Q~tplv-dy-aweme-images:q75.webp?biz_tag=aweme_images&from=3213915784&s=PackSourceEnum_AWEME_DETAIL&sc=image&se=false&x-expires=1711152000&x-signature=79xAKu7WyRZXD6O9ZeB992Wr4V4%3D
It looks like the previous rule is no longer valid (return 403) and the new url has signature checks added to it.
Not sure if there is still a way to get the original image url and can acess.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reporting. Same issue for tiktok.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
It looks like the previous rule is no longer valid (return 403) and the new url has signature checks added to it.
Not sure if there is still a way to get the original image url and can acess.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: