Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Promoting this library #9

Open
paulmelnikow opened this issue May 22, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Promoting this library #9

paulmelnikow opened this issue May 22, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@paulmelnikow
Copy link

I've taken a couple steps to promote this library, e.g. matthew-andrews/isomorphic-fetch#93

This is an elegant, safe, and effective solution to a common problem, one really worth promoting. With the recent changes, I think its scope has changed. It's not just a browser ponyfill, it's also an isomorphic fetch. What do you think about updating the description to reflect that?

isomorphic-fetch describes itself like this:

Isomorphic WHATWG Fetch API, for Node & Browserify

I think what we've got here is:

Isomorphic WHATWG Fetch API ponyfill for Node, Browserify, and Webpack

For people to find this, I think the most effective thing would be to update the github name and npm description along those lines. The second thing would be to mention Browserify and Webpack in npm keywords and in the body of the readme.

Thoughts?

@qubyte
Copy link
Owner

qubyte commented May 22, 2016

Thanks for the evangelism. The scope has changed somewhat. This sounds like a good idea to me!

@STRML
Copy link
Contributor

STRML commented Oct 14, 2016

Just wanted to say thanks for this module - getting bitten by a broken window.fetch() implementation in Edge 14, and this module really helps get past whatwg-fetch's many refusals to implement a UMD shim.

@qubyte
Copy link
Owner

qubyte commented Oct 14, 2016

It is a shame they don't make a UMD module as you say. It's such a hack to do things this way around!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants