Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add default contextView() implem to [Flux|Mono|Synchronous]Sink #3021

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

simonbasle
Copy link
Member

This commit adds a default implementation to the contextView() method added
in 3.5.0-M1 to the FluxSink, MonoSink and SynchronousSink classes.

@simonbasle simonbasle requested a review from a team as a code owner April 19, 2022 15:12
@simonbasle simonbasle added this to the 3.5.0-M2 milestone Apr 19, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle added the type/enhancement A general enhancement label Apr 19, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle self-assigned this Apr 19, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle requested a review from a team April 19, 2022 15:12
@simonbasle simonbasle changed the title Add a default implementation to the [Flux|Mono|Synchronous]Sink#contextView Add default contextView() implem to [Flux|Mono|Synchronous]Sink Apr 20, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle merged commit 6eecf85 into main Apr 20, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle deleted the fluxSinkDefaultContextView branch April 20, 2022 07:44
simonbasle added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2022
This commit backports #3021, a default implementation of the
`contextView()` method of the FluxSink, MonoSink and SynchronousSink
"old sinks" classes.

The backport is necessary because the new method was not added only in
3.5.0-M1 as initially stated, but in 3.4.17 as well.

Backport of commit 6eecf85.
See #2971, #2974 and #3021.
simonbasle added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2022
This commit backports #3021, a default implementation of the
`contextView()` method of the FluxSink, MonoSink and SynchronousSink
"old sinks" classes.

The backport is necessary because the new method was not added only in
3.5.0-M1 as initially stated, but in 3.4.17 as well.

Backport of commit 6eecf85.
See #2971, #2974 and #3021.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants