Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance improvements of bufferTimeout with fair backpressure #3467

Open
chemicL opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #3634
Open

Performance improvements of bufferTimeout with fair backpressure #3467

chemicL opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #3634
Assignees
@chemicL
Labels
area/performance This belongs to the performance theme
Milestone
3.5.17

Comments

@chemicL
Copy link
Member

chemicL commented May 22, 2023

Follow up from #3332 - there is a chance we can reduce the amount of volatile fields to improve the performance of the bufferTimeout with fair backpressure operator.
@chemicL chemicL added the area/performance This belongs to the performance theme label May 22, 2023
@chemicL chemicL added this to the 3.4.x Backlog milestone May 22, 2023
@patpatpat123
Copy link

cheering up for this!

@chemicL chemicL self-assigned this Mar 20, 2024
@chemicL chemicL modified the milestones: 3.5.x Backlog, 3.5.16 Mar 20, 2024
@chemicL
Copy link
Member Author

chemicL commented Mar 20, 2024

This issue will be resolved once #3634 is merged.

@chemicL chemicL linked a pull request Mar 20, 2024 that will close this issue
BufferTimeout with fair backpressure rework #3634
Open
@chemicL chemicL modified the milestones: 3.5.16, 3.5.17 Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chemicL chemicL

Labels
area/performance This belongs to the performance theme
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.5.17
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

BufferTimeout with fair backpressure rework reactor/reactor-core
3 participants
@chemicL @OlegDokuka @patpatpat123