From 0e2600501a0453ffcd3f7fc0e787e1de8857eb20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kicmeri <58749831+kicmeri@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:20:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update debugging.adoc

Proposing the change as I was unable to make it work in test method or with `@BeforeAll`. Hoping it may save time for others.
---
 docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc b/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
index fc040cc7b9..2b70b60dc0 100644
--- a/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
+++ b/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
@@ -448,8 +448,10 @@ You may also re-process existing classes if you cannot run the init eagerly (e.g
 ====
 [source,java]
 ----
-ReactorDebugAgent.init();
-ReactorDebugAgent.processExistingClasses();
+static {
+    ReactorDebugAgent.init();
+    ReactorDebugAgent.processExistingClasses();
+}
 ----
 ====
 

From 31e8db2c3e17ec387723c896ccf5844990c2cfa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kicmeri <58749831+kicmeri@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 08:32:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Clarify how to use processExistingClasses in
 debugging.adoc

Improve the hint for alternative setups
---
 docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc b/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
index 2b70b60dc0..0fbaee1be7 100644
--- a/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
+++ b/docs/asciidoc/debugging.adoc
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ ReactorDebugAgent.init();
 ====
 
 TIP: Since the implementation will instrument your classes when they are loaded,
-the best place to put it is before everything else in your main(String[]) methood:
+the best place to put it is before everything else in your main(String[]) method:
 ====
 [source,java]
 ----
@@ -444,14 +444,12 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
 ----
 ====
 
-You may also re-process existing classes if you cannot run the init eagerly (e.g. in the tests):
+You may also re-process existing classes with `processExistingClasses()` if you cannot run the init eagerly. For example, in https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#launcher-api-listeners-custom[JUnit5 tests from a `TestExecutionListener`] or even in the class `static` initializer block:
 ====
 [source,java]
 ----
-static {
-    ReactorDebugAgent.init();
-    ReactorDebugAgent.processExistingClasses();
-}
+ReactorDebugAgent.init();
+ReactorDebugAgent.processExistingClasses();
 ----
 ====