We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparing 2 commands I found that service-map.json is consumed differently:
The graph is searching for service-map file only in the rootPath while the fix is using find-up to find it.
graph
fix
The graph is searching for services on the map as serviceMap[keyName] while the fix expect the key to be in one of the following formats: kebab, camel-case or just plain string
It's better to move the logic behind service-map to a separate class and share it between fix and graph
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Comparing 2 commands I found that service-map.json is consumed differently:
The
graph
is searching for service-map file only in the rootPath while thefix
is using find-up to find it.The
graph
is searching for services on the map as serviceMap[keyName] while thefix
expect the key to be in one of the following formats: kebab, camel-case or just plain stringIt's better to move the logic behind service-map to a separate class and share it between
fix
andgraph
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: