Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch license to MIT #48

Open
viceice opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Switch license to MIT #48

viceice opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@maxbrunet
Labels
priority-3-normal Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code

Comments

@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Nov 24, 2021

Most of our projects are using MIT license, so we tend to switch the lisence on this repo too.

Comments?
@viceice viceice added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 24, 2021
@viceice
Copy link
Member Author

viceice commented Nov 24, 2021

This should propably a major bump

@maxbrunet
Copy link
Collaborator

It uses the same ISC license as https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate-approve-bot. The Github description of the license says:

The ISC license is functionally equivalent to the BSD 2-Clause and MIT licenses, removing some language that is no longer necessary.

@viceice
Copy link
Member Author

viceice commented Nov 26, 2021

@rarkins WDYT? Should we stay on MIT and switch remaining too, or schould we switch all to ISC? 🤔

@HonkingGoose HonkingGoose added priority-2-important User-visible bugs or very important features status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code priority-3-normal Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others and removed enhancement New feature or request priority-2-important User-visible bugs or very important features labels Nov 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@maxbrunet maxbrunet

Labels
priority-3-normal Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@viceice @maxbrunet @HonkingGoose