Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: better manager types #15708

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 24, 2022
Merged

refactor: better manager types #15708

merged 6 commits into from May 24, 2022

Conversation

rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator

@rarkins rarkins commented May 24, 2022

Changes

Makes manager mandatory and adds some new types to accommodate that.

Context

One of many steps for #14623

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please tick one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@rarkins rarkins requested a review from viceice May 24, 2022 06:24
@rarkins rarkins marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2022 06:24
@rarkins rarkins changed the title refactor: ManagerConfig refactor: better manager types May 24, 2022
viceice
viceice previously approved these changes May 24, 2022
lib/config/types.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
@rarkins rarkins merged commit c3acca8 into main May 24, 2022
@rarkins rarkins deleted the refactor/manager-config branch May 24, 2022 07:01
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 32.66.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants