This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Docs: distinguish between frequently, commonly, and rarely used options #19874
Labels
priority-4-low
Low priority, unlikely to be done unless it becomes important to more people
status:requirements
Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started
type:docs
Documentation
Describe the proposed change(s).
Today our config options list is huge. More features is good, but for someone starting out it's intimidating to browse through.
Ideally we need a way to highlight to people both:
If we just wanted to highlight commonly used settings, that can or should also be done using getting started guides/tutorials. But even if so it would still be good to mark features as proposed to make them more quick to skim through.
We could also consider breaking complex options like packageRules and hostRules into their own page.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: