Just a little api critic.

[heartforit]

Hi guys,

i really like this library, you guys made an awesome job. I like to use this library.
But, please provide a alias for request.del => request.delete, because i was confused, because the method name mostly represents the http method and that surly does sense to me.

Best,
mrlove

[simov]

I think that might be a good idea. Of course delete is a reserved keyword, but I'm not sure if that may cause any issues as a property name.

[heartforit]

Yeah, it would be interesting to figure that out. I guess it should not be a big deal, but i don´t have time to invest more on it yet. I just like to give my two cents to it.. :) Clear api is a good basis for easy readable and writeable software. I guess you know that.

[SimonSchick]

I played around with it, there is no naming conflict with the delete keyword.

[Tyler-Murphy]

I also think this is a good idea.

Would a pull request for the following change be accepted?

request.del = verbFunc('del')
request['delete']= request.del

I see that PR #16 was rejected in 2011, but I don't think there's any problem using reserved keywords as object property names. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7022397/using-reserved-words-as-property-names-revisited

[Tyler-Murphy]

It looks like #2175 resolves this.

[simov]

Yep, I though this was going to be automatically closed but since the other PR was closed instead of merged this issue was left open.