Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix - do not remove OAuth param when using OAuth realm #1679

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 17, 2015
Merged

Fix - do not remove OAuth param when using OAuth realm #1679

merged 2 commits into from Jul 17, 2015

Conversation

jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor

…thing in the array.

When using oauth with a realm I was losing one of the parameters we needed, changing 1 to 0 adds realm at the front with out removing anything from the array.

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 16, 2015

Right that definitely looks like a bug. I'll fix the tests tomorrow 👍

@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome thanks

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 17, 2015

@jhalickman can you pull https://github.com/simov/request/tree/oauth-realm-fix here? Then I'll merge it.

@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry I am confused, what do you want me to do?

-- 
Joshua Halickman

On July 17, 2015 at 10:52:03 AM, simo (notifications@github.com) wrote:

@jhalickman can you pull https://github.com/simov/request/tree/oauth-realm-fix here? Then I'll merge it.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 17, 2015

Just git pull git@github.com:simov/request.git oauth-realm-fix into yours, and push again. If you have any difficulties I can figure out something on my end. You can apply the test fixes on your own too, we just need the tests passing here, in this PR, for the sake of completeness.

@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like https://github.com/simov/request/commits/oauth-realm-fix already has my change in there, would I need to make any other changes?

-- 
Joshua Halickman

On July 17, 2015 at 11:31:46 AM, simo (notifications@github.com) wrote:

Just git pull git@github.com:simov/request.git oauth-realm-fix into yours, and push again. If you have any difficulties I can figure out something on my end. You can apply the test fixes on your own too, we just need the tests passing here, in this PR, for the sake of completeness.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 17, 2015

No, just execute the above command and push again, that's all.

@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ahh I get it so you merge from my PR. Should be done.

-- 
Joshua Halickman

On July 17, 2015 at 11:49:22 AM, simo (notifications@github.com) wrote:

No, just execute the above command and push again, that's all.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

simov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2015
Fix - do not remove OAuth param when using OAuth realm
@simov simov merged commit 50ee190 into request:master Jul 17, 2015
@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 17, 2015

Yep I fetch'ed your branch and pushed to my repo.

Thanks 👍

@simov simov changed the title When adding realm to the front of the params array do not replace any… Fix - do not remove OAuth param when using OAuth realm Jul 17, 2015
@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just curious if this is going to get into NPM in the near future?

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 17, 2015

I think we should have a new release pretty soon. Probably on Monday. I'm going to wrap up the latest PR's during the weekend and publish.

@jhalickman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome thanks for all the help!

-- 
Joshua Halickman

On July 17, 2015 at 12:06:26 PM, simo (notifications@github.com) wrote:

I think we should have a new release pretty soon. Probably on Monday. I'm going to wrap up the latest PR's during the weekend and publish.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@simov
Copy link
Member

simov commented Jul 20, 2015

Version 2.59 is published #1683

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants