Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support taint toleration in the nfs CRD #2

Open
jproig opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Support taint toleration in the nfs CRD #2

jproig opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@jproig
Copy link
Contributor

jproig commented Jan 4, 2021

Is this a bug report or feature request?

  • Feature Request

What should the feature do:
Allow to run the NFS servers in specific tainted cluster nodes.

What is use case behind this feature:
For example, in GCP, in order to support high IOPS some specific machine type is desired and I would like to place the NFS servers in those specific nodes.

Environment:

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in a week if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity. Please re-open if this still requires investigation.

@jproig
Copy link
Contributor Author

jproig commented Apr 12, 2021

I think this is still a nice feature to have

@huats
Copy link
Contributor

huats commented Apr 12, 2021

I clearly agree. I am using it quite often with a need to manually edit the statefulset to add that.

@travisn travisn reopened this Apr 12, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in a week if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@BlaineEXE BlaineEXE transferred this issue from rook/rook Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants