You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature Request
To support vhost style we introduce RGW support Rook mimic rgw dns names with hosting.DNSname field in cephobjectstore CRD. But limitation is that it includes all the domains in which rgw server can be accessed. So Rook Op cannot identity which of them is wildcard support, can use those domains specifically for OBC config maps. To add that support better user need to convey which endpoint supports wildcards, so Rook can use those as the preferred way of accessing rgw server
What should the feature do:
Introduce new field wildcard dns endpoints in the hosting session
What is use case behind this feature:
Improves accuracy in the choosing the endpoint for rgw server
Environment:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The users need to careful about port and ssl certs while consuming
virtual host feature for rgw.
Fixes: rook#14087
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
The users need to careful about port and ssl certs while consuming
virtual host feature for rgw.
Fixes: rook#14087
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Is this a bug report or feature request?
To support vhost style we introduce RGW support Rook mimic
rgw dns names
withhosting.DNSname
field in cephobjectstore CRD. But limitation is that it includes all the domains in which rgw server can be accessed. So Rook Op cannot identity which of them is wildcard support, can use those domains specifically for OBC config maps. To add that support better user need to convey which endpoint supports wildcards, so Rook can use those as the preferred way of accessing rgw serverWhat should the feature do:
Introduce new field
wildcard dns endpoints
in the hosting sessionWhat is use case behind this feature:
Improves accuracy in the choosing the endpoint for rgw server
Environment:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: