Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ceph: adding 'namespace' field to the needed ceph queries #8901

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2021

Conversation

aruniiird
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the namespace field to other ceph alerts

Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Mohan amohan@redhat.com

Description of your changes:

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
  • Skip Tests for Docs: Add the flag for skipping the build if this is only a documentation change. See here for the flag.
  • Skip Unrelated Tests: Add a flag to run tests for a specific storage provider. See test options.
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes, if necessary.
  • Upgrade from previous release is tested and upgrade user guide is updated, if necessary.
  • Code generation (make codegen) has been run to update object specifications, if necessary.

Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Mohan <amohan@redhat.com>
@mergify mergify bot added the ceph main ceph tag label Oct 1, 2021
@leseb leseb merged commit 3c93eb3 into rook:master Oct 1, 2021
leseb added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2021
ceph: adding 'namespace' field to the needed ceph queries (backport #8901)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ceph main ceph tag
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants