Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

csi: fix comment for the provisioner and clusterID #8990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 18, 2021

Conversation

Madhu-1
Copy link
Member

@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 commented Oct 18, 2021

Description of your changes:

fixed provisioner and clusterID comment to match the correct namespace.

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna madhupr007@gmail.com

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
  • Skip Tests for Docs: Add the flag for skipping the build if this is only a documentation change. See here for the flag.
  • Skip Unrelated Tests: Add a flag to run tests for a specific storage provider. See test options.
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes, if necessary.
  • Upgrade from previous release is tested and upgrade user guide is updated, if necessary.
  • Code generation (make codegen) has been run to update object specifications, if necessary.

fixed provisioner and clusterID comment to match
the correct namespace.

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 added the docs label Oct 18, 2021
@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 requested a review from leseb October 18, 2021 05:10
@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 added the csi label Oct 18, 2021
@leseb leseb merged commit ceae760 into rook:master Oct 18, 2021
travisn added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2021
csi: fix comment for the provisioner and clusterID (backport #8990)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants