New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ceph v16.2.x Upgrade Warning #9185
Comments
Briefly checking the ceph code and git log, this seems to be the situation:
So since rook does not set |
OMAP is used by Ceph under the hood for CephObjectStores and CephFilesystems. If users only use CephBlockPools (RBD), I don't see why they would need to worry about the issue. I also don't see why users shouldn't feel safe to update if they are using the default value or if they set the value to Obviously, if users are cautious, they should wait to upgrade, period. If they are eager, I think they can proceed after verifying that the A user can find out if
To set both of these
If |
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Users can also use
|
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Also, users should ensure that no references to |
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue #9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 1f87196) # Conflicts: # Documentation/ceph-upgrade.md
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue #9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 1f87196)
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue #9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 1f87196)
Why not refuse the upgrade if Rook sees this option enabled? Rook can detect the current version and the newly applied one. So users risk data loss why not block the upgrade in Rook? Is this closed in #9187 or is more work planned? |
Since it's so rare that this option would remain enabled during a pacific upgrade, my assumption is that documentation would be sufficient. Since 16.2.7 is almost out as well and people tend to update to the latest dot release anyway, it didn't seem worth a code fix like that to prevent the upgrade. But i'm open to that check as well if someone wants to implement it. |
I think we can consider this closed by #9187. I'll close this now, and we can reopen if people think it's useful to keep open or if there are more changes needed. |
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 1f87196)
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Ceph has recently reported that it may be unsafe to upgrade clusters from Nautilus/Octopus to Pacific v16.2.0 through v16.2.6. We are tracking this in Rook issue rook#9185. Add a warning to the upgrade doc about this. Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Ceph has published a warning for upgrading from an "older version" to (any?) Pacific release, see https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/#v16-2-6-pacific.
Questions coming to my mind:
bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount
tofalse
in running Ceph clusters?Anything else that should be answered regarding this "warning" from Ceph?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: