Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Recommend primary affinity over hybrid pools #9465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 20, 2021

Conversation

travisn
Copy link
Member

@travisn travisn commented Dec 17, 2021

Description of your changes:
Hybrid pools suffer from lower availability when a node goes down, so we recommend primary affinity instead of hybrid pools.

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #9298

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
  • Skip Tests for Docs: Add the flag for skipping the build if this is only a documentation change. See here for the flag.
  • Skip Unrelated Tests: Add a flag to run tests for a specific storage provider. See test options.
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes, if necessary.
  • Upgrade from previous release is tested and upgrade user guide is updated, if necessary.
  • Code generation (make codegen) has been run to update object specifications, if necessary.

Hybrid pools suffer from lower availability when a node goes down,
so we recommend primary affinity instead of hybrid pools.

Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
@satoru-takeuchi satoru-takeuchi merged commit d6d2b4b into rook:master Dec 20, 2021
satoru-takeuchi added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
docs: Recommend primary affinity over hybrid pools (backport #9465)
@travisn travisn deleted the primary-affinity-doc branch February 24, 2022 22:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't write to a 2-replica hybrid storage pool when i lose one node
2 participants