Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking Issue for WebAssembly exception handling #118168

Open
4 of 8 tasks
coolreader18 opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
4 of 8 tasks

Tracking Issue for WebAssembly exception handling #118168

coolreader18 opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.

Comments

@coolreader18
Copy link
Contributor

coolreader18 commented Nov 22, 2023

This is a tracking issue for wasm native exception handling, which would allow panic=unwind to function properly for code targeting wasm.

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.

Steps

Unresolved Questions

  • -C target-feature=+exception-handling vs -C panic=unwind -- does one imply the other, or is one of them redundant?
    • panic=unwind should enable exception-handling
  • Should -C llvm-args=-wasm-enable-eh be passed by default on all wasm targets, to be stripped out if the exception-handling target feature is disabled?
    • yes: afaict -wasm-enable-eh does not affect codegen in general, only isel for the wasm.throw instruction.
  • Should exception-handling instructions (e.g. from prebuilt libstd) be stripped out if panic=abort? If so, by whom? wasm-ld? wasm-opt does currently implement a --strip-eh pass; maybe that's good enough if users want to target wasm MVP?
    • this problem is similar to the one that atomics (Tracking issue for WebAssembly atomics #77839) faces, of a single prebuilt libstd coming into conflict with some users needing backwards compatibility with wasm-MVP and others wanting to use more recently stabilized features

Implementation history

@coolreader18 coolreader18 added the C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. label Nov 22, 2023
@coolreader18
Copy link
Contributor Author

coolreader18 commented Nov 22, 2023

(The unresolved questions might have obvious answers that I couldn't see, those are just the questions I came up with in poking around and trying to add wasm32 support to libpanic_unwind)

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
…r=cuviper

std support for wasm32 panic=unwind

Tracking issue: rust-lang#118168

This adds std support for `-Cpanic=unwind` on wasm, and with it slightly more fleshed out rustc support. Now, the stable default is still panic=abort without exception-handling, but if you `-Zbuild-std` with `RUSTFLAGS=-Cpanic=unwind`, you get wasm exception-handling try/catch blocks in the binary:

```rust
#[no_mangle]
pub fn foo_bar(x: bool) -> *mut u8 {
    let s = Box::<str>::from("hello");
    maybe_panic(x);
    Box::into_raw(s).cast()
}

#[inline(never)]
#[no_mangle]
fn maybe_panic(x: bool) {
    if x {
        panic!("AAAAA");
    }
}
```
```wat
;; snip...
(try $label$5
 (do
  (call $maybe_panic
   (local.get $0)
  )
  (br $label$1)
 )
 (catch_all
  (global.set $__stack_pointer
   (local.get $1)
  )
  (call $__rust_dealloc
   (local.get $2)
   (i32.const 5)
   (i32.const 1)
  )
  (rethrow $label$5)
 )
)
;; snip...
```
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
…r=cuviper

std support for wasm32 panic=unwind

Tracking issue: rust-lang#118168

This adds std support for `-Cpanic=unwind` on wasm, and with it slightly more fleshed out rustc support. Now, the stable default is still panic=abort without exception-handling, but if you `-Zbuild-std` with `RUSTFLAGS=-Cpanic=unwind`, you get wasm exception-handling try/catch blocks in the binary:

```rust
#[no_mangle]
pub fn foo_bar(x: bool) -> *mut u8 {
    let s = Box::<str>::from("hello");
    maybe_panic(x);
    Box::into_raw(s).cast()
}

#[inline(never)]
#[no_mangle]
fn maybe_panic(x: bool) {
    if x {
        panic!("AAAAA");
    }
}
```
```wat
;; snip...
(try $label$5
 (do
  (call $maybe_panic
   (local.get $0)
  )
  (br $label$1)
 )
 (catch_all
  (global.set $__stack_pointer
   (local.get $1)
  )
  (call $__rust_dealloc
   (local.get $2)
   (i32.const 5)
   (i32.const 1)
  )
  (rethrow $label$5)
 )
)
;; snip...
```
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121438 - coolreader18:wasm32-panic-unwind, r=cuviper

std support for wasm32 panic=unwind

Tracking issue: rust-lang#118168

This adds std support for `-Cpanic=unwind` on wasm, and with it slightly more fleshed out rustc support. Now, the stable default is still panic=abort without exception-handling, but if you `-Zbuild-std` with `RUSTFLAGS=-Cpanic=unwind`, you get wasm exception-handling try/catch blocks in the binary:

```rust
#[no_mangle]
pub fn foo_bar(x: bool) -> *mut u8 {
    let s = Box::<str>::from("hello");
    maybe_panic(x);
    Box::into_raw(s).cast()
}

#[inline(never)]
#[no_mangle]
fn maybe_panic(x: bool) {
    if x {
        panic!("AAAAA");
    }
}
```
```wat
;; snip...
(try $label$5
 (do
  (call $maybe_panic
   (local.get $0)
  )
  (br $label$1)
 )
 (catch_all
  (global.set $__stack_pointer
   (local.get $1)
  )
  (call $__rust_dealloc
   (local.get $2)
   (i32.const 5)
   (i32.const 1)
  )
  (rethrow $label$5)
 )
)
;; snip...
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant