Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Workflows: galaxy-importer fails due to missing module community.general.pids #716

Open
berndfinger opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Workflows: galaxy-importer fails due to missing module community.general.pids #716

berndfinger opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@berndfinger

Comments

@berndfinger
Copy link
Member

See https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/69ccd596b20c4ef5bc0789fcd70f4fc6 or https://ansible.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/69ccd596b20c4ef5bc0789fcd70f4fc6/log/job-output.txt#672 .

The error message is:
WARNING: roles/sap_swpm/tasks/swpm.yml:74:3: 'syntax-check[unknown-module]:' 'couldn'\''t' resolve module/action ''\''community.general.pids'\''.
@berndfinger berndfinger self-assigned this Apr 18, 2024
berndfinger added a commit to berndfinger/community.sap_install that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2024
@berndfinger
Collection: Define collection dependency for community.general
4face93 
... in an attempt to solve issue sap-linuxlab#716.

Signed-off-by: Bernd Finger <bfinger@redhat.com>
@berndfinger berndfinger mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2024
Open
berndfinger added a commit to berndfinger/community.sap_install that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2024
@berndfinger
sap_swpm: Minor tweaks
59a21d5 
Relates to sap-linuxlab#716 and sap-linuxlab#719.

Signed-off-by: Bernd Finger <bfinger@redhat.com>
@berndfinger berndfinger mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2024
Open
@marcelmamula
Copy link
Contributor

@berndfinger Wouldn't this become redundant change when #720 is implemented?

@berndfinger
Copy link
Member Author

@berndfinger Wouldn't this become redundant change when #720 is implemented?

Yes, that was one of the justifications for opening #720. However, as per #709 (comment), changing essential code in sap_swpm will trigger a lot of testing and thus take some time before we can integrate it, so both of #709 and #720 might take some time. Maybe fixing #716 can be done earlier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@berndfinger berndfinger

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@berndfinger @marcelmamula