New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation improvement #189
Comments
No reason, it was probably pulled out in a refactor. If you want to document it, that would be great. |
Is there a reason that an official API documentation page does not exist for fuzzywuzzy? I was unable to find API documentation from the blog that is linked on this Github page. For a project as well known and widely used as this, I was fully expecting a Python Read-the-Docs page to exist for it. If you have your docstrings properly set up in your source code, then you should be able to mostly auto-generate your documentation from your source code. Do you need someone to take on this task, or is it something that is already under way? |
This is not underway. The current documentation is setup in the readme. If you want to help get Sphinx docs setup, feel free to make a pull request and I can take care of the RTD end. |
#258 starts the documentation using Sphinx. @josegonzalez are you still interested in adding RTD integration? |
I don't currently work at SeatGeek, though maybe someone will work on this in the next few weeks? |
I was looking for a
process
function which would return the best x matches above a certain score cutoff. After some amount of searching and scrolling through the source code, I foundextractBests
which (almost) does what I want it to.Is there a specific reason why
extractBests
is not mentioned in the documentation?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: