fix(Templates): Upgrade log4j to 2.17.1
#10430
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10430 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.89% 85.89%
=======================================
Files 335 335
Lines 13934 13934
=======================================
Hits 11968 11968
Misses 1966 1966 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
pgrzesik
suggested changes
Jan 3, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot @GrahamCampbell - could you also bump the versions in aws-kotlin-jvm-gradle example so we have everything covered in this PR? I think one extra will be needed for the aws-lambda-java-log4j2 library, but there's no new releases of that yet.
|
@pgrzesik Rebased, and done. :) |
pgrzesik
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2022
pgrzesik
changed the title
log4j to 2.17.1
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Yes, yet another vulnerability. 馃槶