Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

High level plan to use funds #310

Open
siddharthkp opened this issue Jun 27, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

High level plan to use funds #310

siddharthkp opened this issue Jun 27, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@siddharthkp
Copy link
Owner

siddharthkp commented Jun 27, 2019

Context: We have $10k of funding from the Chrome Performance Fund to support bundlesize's 1.0.0 roadmap

After talking to a few folks who have more experience running a funded open source project, this is how I'm thinking of using the funds.

Having a small core team would lead better results than creating a bounty-style format for issues.

Allocation:

  • $6,000: For the implementation of the roadmap

    1 person full time (me) + 2 part time for the next 2 months (July + August)

    I feel awkward paying myself to work on bundlesize as it's "author". But, if I was working full-time on a project that I did not start, I would prefer to get paid 🤷‍♂

  • $500: For folks who have helped get bundlesize to get here.

    Top 2 contributors (excluding me)+ dependencies we use (via opencollective, it's 90% Sindre)

    _I noticed this isn't common at all. I see it like a "gift" back more than a "payment"?

  • $3,500: Fund the long term maintenance

    Bug fixes, issue triage, docs, review pull requests. Based on the amount of work, this should help 2 people working part time till the end of the year (maybe more)

    Edit: Ideally, these are the same folks from the implementation phase ⬆️

@siddharthkp
Copy link
Owner Author

cc @stubbornella @addyosmani @SaraVieira @mxstbr @developit @hzoo Would love some feedback on this.

(these are the folks I reached out for permission to tag in issues about using funds)

@mxstbr
Copy link

mxstbr commented Jun 27, 2019

Having a small core team would lead better results than creating a bounty-style format for issues.

Strongly agreed!

I feel awkward paying myself to work on bundlesize as it's "author". But, if I was working full-time on a project that I did not start, I would prefer to get paid 🤷‍♂

Don't feel awkward about that, you deserve to be paid if you spend full-time working on this package while you could be making money. That's the whole point of funding people, get them to work on important packages like this full-time! (Addy, correct me if I am wrong on this)

Bug fixes, issue triage, docs, review pull requests. Based on the amount of work, this should help 2 people working part time till the end of the year (maybe more)

I think it'd make sense to make sure these are the same people already working on the implementation (probably including you), as they will have the most context around the challenges and implementation details.

@kuldeepkeshwar
Copy link
Contributor

totally make sense

@SaraVieira
Copy link
Collaborator

Having a small core team would lead better results than creating a bounty-style format for issues.

I think so too yes.

I feel awkward paying myself to work on bundlesize as it's "author". But, if I was working full-time on a project that I did not start, I would prefer to get paid 🤷‍♂

Honestly I think this makes perfect sense if you also wanna be motivated and make the time for it

I think all of this is very well thought out now we just need to recruit the humans 😂

@addyosmani
Copy link

I just wanted to say I'm very supportive of the current plan for how to use the funds.

I know there can be a stigma associated with package maintainers getting paid via these types of donations, but if you're significantly helping move the roadmap forward, you totally deserve to get compensated :)

@Meemaw
Copy link

Meemaw commented Nov 13, 2019

What happened with those funds? It seems like the project is not being maintained at all?

@siddharthkp
Copy link
Owner Author

siddharthkp commented Nov 16, 2019

Hi @Meemaw As of now, the funds are sitting in the opencollective unused. Even though the funds can help compensate contributors for their work, the contributors of the repo (including me) have day jobs that come first.

For what it's worth, I have some time blocked next month to work towards the 1.0.0 roadmap.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants