Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Trove #3069

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 16, 2020
Merged

Add Trove #3069

merged 2 commits into from Jun 16, 2020

Conversation

davidjb
Copy link
Contributor

@davidjb davidjb commented May 13, 2020

trove

Issue:

Checklist

  • I updated the JSON data in _data/simple-icons.json
  • I optimized the icon with SVGO or SVGOMG
  • The SVG viewbox is 0 0 24 24

Description

Color determined from the fill colour of the icon in the SVG logo at https://trove.nla.gov.au/. T shaped part of the logo was extracted, which is the icon used as the site's Favicon.

@PeterShaggyNoble PeterShaggyNoble added the new icon Issues or pull requests for adding a new icon label May 13, 2020
@PeterShaggyNoble
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this one, @davidjb

First thing we need to do is to determine whether this is within scope for us. As it has no Alexa rank of its own for us to go on, we need to look at some secondary metrics, i.e. their social media. They have 22.1k followers on Twitter which, to me makes it significant enough for inclusion but, as we're still trying to determine our cut-off points for things like this, we'll need some feedback from one of the other @simple-icons/maintainers too.

If it's decided that it is within our scope then there are a couple of imperfections and excess points from the source file that will need to be cleaned up before we merge it in - I see you caught a couple of them already.

@PeterShaggyNoble PeterShaggyNoble added the in discussion There is an ongoing discussion that should be finished before we can continue label May 13, 2020
@davidjb
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidjb commented May 14, 2020

Thanks @PeterShaggyNoble -- there's some other icons in this research-related space I could contribute as well, depending on if there's a decision that this fits.

@ericcornelissen
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is sufficiently popular and I would be happy to add it.

If it's decided that it is within our scope then there are a couple of imperfections and excess points from the source file that will need to be cleaned up before we merge it in - I see you caught a couple of them already.

Could you point them out @PeterShaggyNoble?

@PeterShaggyNoble
Copy link
Member

In the original file, nearly all of the square corners have an unneeded point, the four outer, rounded corners have a few where they meet the straight edges, and the diagonals at the bottom have a few too. And then there's this imperfection on both of the innermost diagonals:

@PeterShaggyNoble PeterShaggyNoble added changes requested and removed in discussion There is an ongoing discussion that should be finished before we can continue labels May 26, 2020
@davidjb
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidjb commented May 27, 2020

The icon was quite a mess -- I'll check things more carefully in future. For this one, here's what I changed:

  • Removed the extra points from the curves
  • Cleaned the jagged edges at the bottom of the central diagonals and at the right edge
  • Farthest nodes left edge of the icon didn't line up - the top of segment didn't align with the bottom in terms of X coordinates; they do now
  • Cleaned another jagged edge at the top-right curve - cluster of points reduced to a single node
  • Nodes positioned at the same conceptual Y coordinates (eg curves and levels of the T shape, etc) have been aligned. They were a few thousandths of the unit out on the left of the T versus the right.

Copy link
Member

@PeterShaggyNoble PeterShaggyNoble left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incredible attention to detail, @davidjb 👍 I'd forgotten about the crooked lines from my initial review.

Given all the tweaks, it's to be expected that this no longer lines up with the original so I'm happy to merge this as-is but we'll need one of the other @simple-icons/maintainers to throw an eye over it too.

@davidjb
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidjb commented Jun 16, 2020

Any more changes needed on this one before merging?

Copy link
Contributor

@ericcornelissen ericcornelissen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apologies for the delay @davidjb, this looks good to me as well so I'll be merging this shortly (if the build succeeds)

@ericcornelissen ericcornelissen merged commit fa1f9c2 into simple-icons:develop Jun 16, 2020
@davidjb
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidjb commented Jun 16, 2020

No worries, thanks @ericcornelissen. I’m glad the linting passed, that could have been embarrassing if it failed the size test 😅

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2020
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2020
# New Icons

- Ansys (#3211)
- Google News (#2790)
- Mini (#3210)
- Shikimori (#3179)
- Trove (#3069)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new icon Issues or pull requests for adding a new icon
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants