New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Canonical #3184
Add Canonical #3184
Conversation
As there are indeed significant difference in code optimization, I have finally updated the icon with svgomg online tool. |
Thanks for taking this one on, @gizmecano 👍 The path looks spot on to me, it just needs to be centred on the canvas. Also, using |
|
Ah, hadn't seen that. In that case, I agree with the choice of colour. |
I don't quite understand what @PeterShaggyNoble means... The path seems absolutely centered in my editor (Inkscape) and I don't really see what I can change here... 🤔 Can you explain me what seems erroneous on your own side? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
D'oh! I hadn't spotted that the x & y coordinates of the Looks perfect to me now - thanks again for your efforts on this one, @gizmecano 👍 |
Do not hesitate to tell me if you see such an error: I have to say I'm not necessarily experienced enough for checking all required elements. |
Issue: Request: Canonical #3148
Checklist
_data/simple-icons.json
viewbox
is0 0 24 24
Description
Note I do not check I optimized the icon with SVGO or SVGOMG because I usually operate with svgcleaner that generally does the optimization job well. Let me know if you think there seems to be a significant difference in code optimization.I used vector files from Canonical symbol set for web and added color
#77216F
as suggested by @ericcornelissen in his comment.