New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document that it is allowed to assert on dedicated spy calls. #1688
Conversation
Thank you for your pull request @Flarna Reviewing this pull request allowed me to discover that we are missing tests for some of the assertions. Only in one place do we verify that an assertion also works with a Would you be up for expanding your pull request?
|
sure, will do that - hopefully soon.
I thought I found all of them - but looking again I think that I forgot |
@mroderick Updated docs and added tests. I tried to act like a a roman in rome in the tests; hope it fits. Still pending is the merge into older docs. |
Looks good to me 👍 Do go ahead and fold the documentation updates into the older docs. |
@mroderick older docs are updated now |
This has been published to npm as |
Purpose (TL;DR) - mandatory
Document that some asserts can be done on a
SpyCall
not only on aSpy
. Fixes #1471I updated only master of the doc. Once I'm told that wording is ok and change is accepted I can update also older releases.
How to verify - mandatory
N/A - just doc update
Checklist for author
npm run lint
passes