Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the ability to set friendly name when using step certificate p12 #1004

Open
aae42 opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Add the ability to set friendly name when using step certificate p12 #1004

aae42 opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement good first issue needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team

Comments

@aae42
Copy link

aae42 commented Aug 15, 2023

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Provide the ability to override the friendly name when using step certificate p12.

Why is this needed?

Sometimes we get specific requests for friendly names in pfx packages.
With openssl pkcs12 we can provide the --name parameter.
I can only assume these friendly names are used as part of some other process where
having the default of <subject> - <fingerprint> is unacceptable.

@aae42 aae42 added enhancement needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team labels Aug 15, 2023
@aae42
Copy link
Author

aae42 commented Aug 15, 2023

don't do a ton of Go and have never contributed here, but made a start w/ this commit, still need to go through the rest of the contribution guidelines...

@hslatman
Copy link
Member

Hi @aae42, sounds like a useful thing to have and good to see you're already working on it. Let us know when we can review or help otherwise 馃檪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement good first issue needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants